Correction: Data in Review on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Letters and Corrections1 September 1988Correction: Data in Review on Magnetic Resonance ImagingDaniel Kent, MDDaniel Kent, MDSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-109-5-438_2 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptTo the Editor: In the article on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (1), there is an error in Table 2.In this table, the true-positive ratio for the "Alternate" column and the first reference were transposed with the true-positive ratio for "MR Imaging" and the second reference. The 0.67 and its confidence interval in the "MR Imaging" column should replace the 0.98 and its confidence interval in the "Alternate" column. The 0.98 and its confidence interval should replace the 0.67 under "MR Imaging."The text corresponding to this part of the table appears on page 405. The fifth sentence in the...Reference1. KentLarson DE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine: is clinical efficacy established after the first decade? Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:402-24. LinkGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 1 September 1988Volume 109, Issue 5Page: 438-438KeywordsConfidence intervalsMagnetic resonance imaging Issue Published: 1 September 1988 PDF DownloadLoading ...