Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043651.].
Highlights
The authors apologize for this error, and clarify that the panel in question represents the pdnaA experimental results, as reported in [2]
The authors would like to mention that the data duplicated in the Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek article [2] represent the positive and the negative controls in the corresponding experiments and were reused unintentionally only for easier data comparison
Note that the data shown in the upper row correspond to the data that were originally and mistakenly used in the Fig 4B of the PLOS ONE article as picl1 panel, these lanes represent experimental results for the pdnaA panel as reported in [2]. (TIF)
Summary
The authors apologize for this error, and clarify that the panel in question represents the pdnaA experimental results, as reported in [2].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
