Abstract

This paper compares three types of standard errors for optimal minimum distance (OMD) estimator where the structural parameter is recovered from the reduced form parameters estimated by a two-step GMM estimator. We demonstrate that the naive standard errors are severely biased and cause over-rejection, while the OMD estimator based on the bias-corrected variance matrix by Windmeijer (2005) and newly derived variance estimator yield much more accurate inference.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.