Abstract

Biogenesis of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria depends on dedicated macromolecular transport systems. The LolABCDE proteins make up the machinery for lipoprotein trafficking from the inner membrane (IM) across the periplasm to the outer membrane (OM). The Lol apparatus is additionally responsible for differentiating OM lipoproteins from those for the IM. In Enterobacteriaceae, a default sorting mechanism has been proposed whereby an aspartic acid at position +2 of the mature lipoproteins prevents Lol recognition and leads to their IM retention. In other bacteria, the conservation of sequences immediately following the acylated cysteine is variable. Here we show that in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the three essential Lol proteins (LolCDE) can be replaced with those from Escherichia coli The P. aeruginosa lipoproteins MexA, OprM, PscJ, and FlgH, with different sequences at their N termini, were correctly sorted by either the E. coli or P. aeruginosa LolCDE. We further demonstrate that an inhibitor of E. coli LolCDE is active against P. aeruginosa only when expressing the E. coli orthologues. Our work shows that Lol proteins recognize a wide range of signals, consisting of an acylated cysteine and a specific conformation of the adjacent domain, determining IM retention or transport to the OM.IMPORTANCE Gram-negative bacteria build their outer membranes (OM) from components that are initially located in the inner membrane (IM). A fraction of lipoproteins is transferred to the OM by the transport machinery consisting of LolABCDE proteins. Our work demonstrates that the LolCDE complexes of the transport pathways of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are interchangeable, with the E. coli orthologues correctly sorting the P. aeruginosa lipoproteins while retaining their sensitivity to a small-molecule inhibitor. These findings question the nature of IM retention signals, identified in E. coli as aspartate at position +2 of mature lipoproteins. We propose an alternative model for the sorting of IM and OM lipoproteins based on their relative affinities for the IM and the ability of the promiscuous sorting machinery to deliver lipoproteins to their functional sites in the OM.

Highlights

  • The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria contains a set of proteins that are tethered to either the inner membrane (IM) or the outer membrane (OM) via fatty acids attached to their amino-terminal cysteines [1]

  • In order to compare the specificities of the E. coli and P. aeruginosa Lol pathways during the early steps in lipoprotein transport, we replaced the lolCDE genes of P. aeruginosa with those from E. coli [9, 14]

  • In this study, we examined the specificities of sorting machineries for a group of lipoproteins that significantly differ at their mature N termini, which likely functions as a sorting signal determining IM retention or OM transport

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria contains a set of proteins that are tethered to either the inner membrane (IM) or the outer membrane (OM) via fatty acids attached to their amino-terminal cysteines [1]. Substituting aspartic acid for the same glycine did not affect the localization of MexA G2D in P. aeruginosa but resulted in colocalization with an OM protein in E. coli, suggesting that the basis of strain specificity is the coevolution of the Lol machinery with Lol avoidance signals in distinct bacterial species [15]. The evolutionary conservation of the aspartate residue at position ϩ2 and its mutagenesis causing mislocalization have been interpreted as evidence that this particular amino acid represents a critical determinant for lipoproteins to avoid extraction from the IM by LolCDE and transfer to LolA for OM targeting [11, 16]. This observation suggests that this molecule functions by binding to unique sites on the E. coli LolC or LolE and that activity against divergent Lol systems for a broad-spectrum drug will require a design approach based on the structure of the inhibitor and its protein target

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call