Abstract

T otal joint arthroplasty (TJA) infection causes severe morbidity that may result in mortality, and generates substantial costs both to the patient and the healthcare system. Early studies found that the use of negative-pressure body exhaust suits decreased the risk of deep infection following TJA [1, 4]. However, more-recent work has found an equal or higher infection rate with use of modern positive-pressure surgical helmet systems compared to conventional surgical gowns [2, 5]. It is not known why surgical helmet systems have not yielded similar decreases in infection rates as those reported with body exhaust suits. There are numerous challenges in answering this question among cases employing surgical helmet systems. These challenges include: (1) Conducting adequately powered studies of TJA infection, a rare event; and (2) using culture-positive TJA infection as a study endpoint as opposed to less-meaningful surrogates for infection.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.