Abstract
T he study by Catelas and colleagues adds to the current scientific consensus that adaptive immune responses to metals occurs in a subset of all people with metal implants. The study authors also found that the incidence of pseudotumors correlates with systemic evidence of metal-related delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses and elevated metal ion levels. The current study identifies alterations in circulating adaptive immune cells in people with elevated levels of metal debris and pseudotumors. These findings support past histological and T-cell function studies, indicating pseudotumors are more prevalent in people with DTH-type immune reactivity. This highlights the growing recognition of these phenomena as central to implant performance in some individuals/implant designs. Case and group studies [4, 5] indicate that once locally activated, adaptive immune inflammation to metal contributes to (if not, mediates) the pathogenesis of poor implant performance. Metal DTH reactivity is a lymphocyte mediated response, similar to a Type IV DTH reaction. Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip failures have been associated with classic DTH responses including periimplant activated lymphocyte accumulations (aseptic lymphocytic vasculitisassociated lesions, [ALVAL]), and dermal and functional lymphocyte hypersensitivity responses to metals [2, 7, 11]. Elevated metal exposure can also cause different forms of toxicity responses in tissue, bone, and immune cells, including cobalt-induced hypoxia-like responses, postulated as causing pseudotumors [10]. Lymphocyte reactivity (metal DTH responses/ALVAL) and pseudotumors can be caused separately [6, 8]. Currently, there are no accepted thresholds for systemic metal ion levels that necessarily indicate for pseudotumor formation or immune reactions [1, 7]; it remains an increased risk association. This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article ‘‘Do Patients With a Failed Metal-onmetal Hip Implant With a Pseudotumor Present Differences in Their Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subpopulations?’’ by Catelas and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/ s11999-015-4466-8. The author certifies that she, or any members of her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writers and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. This CORR Insights comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999015-4466-8. N. J. Hallab PhD (&) Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1735 W Harrison, Cohn Research Bldg, #722, Chicago, IL 60612, USA e-mail: nhallab@rush.edu CORR Insights Published online: 13 October 2015 The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons1 2015
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.