Abstract

E arly-onset scoliosis is a challenging problem that can result in severe deformity, pulmonary insufficiency, and early death. In recent years, there has been great interest in improving the lives of the children affected. Journals are stocked with studies describing competing options that often have similar or identical indications. Derotational casting or bracing, single or dual growing rods, the VEPTR (Synthes Spine Co. West Chester, PA, USA), Shilla (Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA), and anterior flexible tethers are some of the more widely-used options available. Casting and bracing certainly present the least chance of harm to the child and should be chosen for all but the most difficult-to-control curves. Although there is great interest in casting as a cure for infantile scoliosis, casting has also recently been demonstrated as a viable alternative to surgical procedures in delaying definitive fusion in young children [5]. Though occasional skin ulcers arise, growth occurs while spine flexibility is maintained. Growing rods and the VEPTR require regular open procedures to keep pace with the growth of the child. This leads to multiple opportunities for deep infection. Because the devices are distraction-based, kyphosis is often an issue. The diminishing height gains seen with multiple lengthenings [8] or spontaneous spinal fusions [2] also are disturbing. Magec Rods (Ellipse Technologies, Irvine, CA, USA) offer the hope of fewer operations as the rods can be lengthened without an operative intervention. However, these rods only elongate 45 mm, so revisions to place new rods can be expected. Of course, revisions for anchor shifting and similar issues also remain. At present, the high cost of the Magec rods will likely guarantee a financial loss for any hospital. In the Shilla technique, three to four apical vertebrae are exposed and fused using pedicle screws, while proximal and distal screws that capture, but do not lock to the rod, are placed without subperiosteal exposure. Rods with sufficient length are inserted allowing for growth, which occurs as the end anchors slide over the rods without the need for additional procedures. Early This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article ‘‘Apical and Intermediate Anchors Without Fusion Improve Cobb Angle and Thoracic Kyphosis in Early-onset Scoliosis’’ by Enercan and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-0143815-3. The author certifies that he, or any member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/ licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. This CORR Insights comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-0143815-3.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.