Abstract

Imaging studies have shown that children with NF-1 have increased brain volumes compared with age-matched controls and the CCs are disproportionately large. The purpose of this study was to determine if the CC in adults with NF-1 differed from that in matched controls by using DTI and volumetric imaging. MR imaging with DTI was performed in 10 adults with NF-1 and in 10 age-, sex-, and handedness-matched controls by using a 3T system. Total brain volumes and the areas and central lengths of the CC were calculated, along with the radial width of callosal subdivisions, in the 2 groups. Our results showed that the total brain volume was not significantly different between adults with NF-1 and matched controls. The length and total cross-sectional area of the CC were statistically larger in adults with NF-1 compared with controls (approximately 10% longer and 20% greater area). On DTI we found a preservation of the primary eigenvalue with increases in the minor eigenvalues at the genu. We have shown that the increased size of the CC found in children with NF-1 is also present in adults with the syndrome, whereas no difference in total brain volume was found.

Highlights

  • AND PURPOSE: Imaging studies have shown that children with NF-1 have increased brain volumes compared with age-matched controls and the CCs are disproportionately large

  • Our results showed that the total brain volume was not significantly different between adults with NF-1 and matched controls

  • We have shown that the increased size of the CC found in children with NF-1 is present in adults with the syndrome, whereas no difference in total brain volume was found

Read more

Summary

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine if the CC in adults with NF-1 differed from that in matched controls by using DTI and volumetric imaging. The aim of our study was to measure the size of the CC in adults with NF-1 and to compare it with that in control subjects by using the callosal measurement methodology described by Denenberg et al.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.