Abstract

A vast stream of literature has investigated the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firms’ financial performance (FFP). However, this effect has remained unclear and undecided. For instance, numerous studies have examined the direct impact of firms’ CSR initiatives on FFP, as well as examining various mechanisms to explain this relationship, but found inconsistent results. The indecisive results indicate that researchers lack consensus to define a mechanism to understand how and under what conditions CSR can affect FFP. Thus, this research aims to investigate how firms’ CSR perception and disclosure derive accounting- (return on equity: ROE, earnings per share: EPS), market- (Tobin Q) and perception-based firms’ financial performance through the mediation of competitive advantage and boundary conditions of family ownership and CEO narcissism. This research underpins the theoretical lens of the resource-based view to derive hypotheses. The research design employed in this study is quantitative, and the approach to theory development is deductive. Multi-method and multi-source data with temporal breaks are collected from 60 manufacturing firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSE). Primary data are collected from the top and middle managers, while secondary data are collected from the annual reports published by these firms. This research found that competitive advantage significantly mediated the indirect impact of perceived CSR and disclosure on FFP. Further, this relationship is strengthened by the contingencies of family ownership and CEO narcissism. Our results will assist the management of the firms to understand the implications of CSR perceptions and disclosure to derive a competitive advantage that ultimately translates into the firms’ financial performance. Further, this research also revealed that managers should concentrate on the boundary conditions of family ownership and CEO narcissism as well. In particular, this research contributes to understand why CSR is viewed to have a strategic importance for the firms and how a resource-based perspective might be utilized in such endeavors.

Highlights

  • Academics in the field of management and finance consider corporate social responsibility (CSR) an indispensable topic of research, and several organizations are actively getting engaged in CSR activities [1,2]

  • The present study investigated the contingencies of family ownership and CEO narcissism on the CSR and firms’ financial performance (FFP) association with the mediation mechanism of competitive advantage

  • CSR is positively associated with a competitive advantage, which in turn translates to FFP [28,33]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academics in the field of management and finance consider corporate social responsibility (CSR) an indispensable topic of research, and several organizations are actively getting engaged in CSR activities [1,2]. The present research analyzes the boundary conditions of family ownership and CEO narcissism on the CSR and FFP relationship with the mediation of competitive advantage. This research investigates some important and new questions: does competitive advantage mediate the CSR and FFP relationship? The present study investigated the contingencies of family ownership and CEO narcissism on the CSR and FFP association with the mediation mechanism of competitive advantage. The contingency of CEO narcissism can enhance this relationship as narcissistic individuals are showy and may be inclined towards CSR initiatives to fuel their positive self-image, which will benefit the organization to achieve sustainable competitive advantage and translate into superior financial performance.

Resource-Based View
CSR and Firms’ Financial Performance
Mediation of Competitive Advantage
Moderation of Ownership Structure
Moderation of CEO Narcissism
Materials and Methods
Measures
Analytical Strategy
Descriptive Analysis
Hypotheses Testing
H2: Supported and CSnnRss disclosure on
H3: Supported
H3: Supported H3
Low CSRD
H4: Supported H4: Supported H4
Low CEON
Theoretical and Practical Implications
Limitations and Future Directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call