Abstract

The importance of Corporate Social Responsibility cannot be overemphasized, and good Corporate Social Responsibility will constitute good relationship for both the implementing business and its stakeholders- such as customers, community, suppliers, government etc., of such business. The idea behind Corporate Social Responsibility is largely misunderstood by many to deal with only large organizations and multinational. However, even small businesses can in their own little ways be socially responsible. For instance, both large and small businesses do employ workers, operate in a community, impact on the environment on which they operate and are expected to pay taxes to the government of their nation. Consequently, by employing worker, the business is expected to maintain and services such workers in other to retain them and by operating in a community, the business owe such community among other things healthy goods and contributions to societal activities. Therefore, it doesn’t necessarily mean that a business must be large before Corporate Social Responsibility can be implemented. All the aforementioned activities are all inclusive in the Corporate Social Responsibility list. This study considered the meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility from varying authorities, reviewed literatures on previous studies- specifically those with positive relationship, negative relationship, mixed relationship and modest relationship. Following the robust literature review, gaps in studies were identified and consequently, need for further studies. Finally, conclusion was made and recommendations suggested.

Highlights

  • This study reviewed literatures on the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Firm Performance (FP)

  • Multiple regression model was used to ascertain the level of relationship between the variables and the findings showed a positive relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm performance (FP)

  • Measuring corporate social responsibility (CSR), the researchers grouped the companies into CSR and Non-CSR while firm performance was measured with both accounting measurers and market-based measure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study reviewed literatures on the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Firm Performance (FP). Do the elements of corporate social responsibility have their respective nerves through which they respond to organization concern for them and through which the organization must extend their concern It implies that the relationship between employee and firm is different from the relationship between customers, suppliers, communities and the firm. [14] defined firm performance as how organization financial resources are judiciously put to use to achieve the corporate objectives of the organization In this definition, though it sounded from the financial perspective, it encompasses the entire operational activities of the organization in terms of not just effectiveness and efficiency. Having knowledge of the concepts of, corporate social responsibility and firm performance, pave way to treat it as a subject (which invariably, is the essence of this study)

Aims and Objectives
Significance of the Study
Literature Review
Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Mixed Relationship
Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance with Modest Relationship
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call