Abstract

BackgroundIn contemporary complex societies, social values like ethics, corporate social responsibility, and being respectful with the environment, among others, are becoming social requirements. Corporations are expected to fulfill them and, according to empirical evidence, an overwhelming majority aspires to good social valuation. At the same time, the maximization of market share value in the long run continues to be the central corporate goal. Making environmental and social expenses compatible with value creation is a central challenge for corporations since it implies the financial sustainability of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).Methods and ResultsThe value creation capacity of CSR projects, mainly through innovation, is widely acknowledged in economic literature and corporate practice. This fact arouses the need of having a quantitative framework capable of summarizing the value creation capacity of the variables involved in CSR projects. With this aim we build up a sensitivity analysis of real option ratios that studies and quantifies the value creation capacity of CSR projects connected with innovation. Ratio analysis has the advantage of being scale independent. Hence, it furnishes a homogeneous framework to express the interaction of value creation variables and, thus, supports strategic thinking quantitatively. Often, CSR expenses can be regarded as preliminary projects that create the opportunity to undertake a full future project. For them, we obtain the minimum expectations scenario that makes financially sustainable a preliminary project that can be interpreted as a call option. We propose a classification of CSR projects from the decision analysis perspective following a two-fold approach: Their relationship with value creation and their links with existing corporate activities. This classification of CSR projects aims at contributing to choose the best capital budgeting method to study the financial sustainability of the project and identifying those CSR projects that fulfill the required features to be studied from the real options perspective.

Highlights

  • A reliable strategy for the corporate core business cannot be conceived without a reliable Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy

  • The Opportunity Ratio (OPR) and the New Project Ratio (NPR) express, respectively, the value of the opportunity, i.e. the option, on basis of the future capital outlay and the current value of the project to be developed in the future if the opportunity becomes successful

  • In any initial state we should expect a NPR greater than the OPR, which means that the main project shows a negative NPV, because if (c / Gross Present Value (GPV)) < (c / K), NPV = GPV – K < 0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A reliable strategy for the corporate core business cannot be conceived without a reliable Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy. Financial value creation is not possible without fulfilling environmental and social requirements. CSR long run decisions often involve a high degree of complexity. They must make the core business environmentally and socially sustainable, being, at the same time, financially sustainable themselves. The maximization of market share value in the long run continues to be the central corporate goal. Making environmental and social expenses compatible with value creation is a central challenge for corporations since it implies the financial sustainability of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call