Abstract

In order for the capital market to grow sustainably and to be relatively crisis-proof corporate governance has to reduce asymmetric information among shareholders and to allow their accurate reaction to firms' fundamental changes. A preliminary research conducted on a small sample of firms (n = 4) and introducing to a broader study of a more numerous sample (n = 80 - 100), opened on two paradigms of corporate governance. The first one, more frequently practiced as it seems, displays important asymmetric information, high transaction costs, high anticipated agency costs, relatively high corporate risk, relatively low long-term shareholders' value and leads investors to underestimate operational risk and market risk as firm's fundamentals. The second one, seemingly less frequent, is the opposite: low asymmetry of information, low transaction costs, low anticipated agency costs, relatively low corporate risk, relatively high long-term shareholders' value, leading investors to an accurate evaluation of operational risk and market risk as firm's fundamentals.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.