Abstract

This study provides empirical evidence on the determinants of the various types of hedging activities conducted by US manufacturing firms. Using a hand collected data set on the notional amounts hedged, I find that agency costs & managerial ability positively impact a firm's decision to hedge their interest rate and foreign exchange risks. To test for capital market benefits, I demonstrate that firms that hedge are able to take on more debt, and hold less cash as a result of the reduced cash flow variance and agency conflicts achieved by hedging. I also show that firms that hedge interest rate risks experience lower stock market volatility around a global economic shock. In order to analyze how firms and auditors account for corporate derivative usage, I split the amounts hedged by their accounting designation as under FAS 133. I provide evidence that firms and auditors find the accounting complexity of foreign exchange hedges greater than that of interest rate hedges.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call