Abstract

This research explains the correlation between corporate governance, risk management, bank performance, and ownership structure. The research has used a set of independent variables related to revelation and precision. The data from 39 banks working in Pakistan have been used for the time period of 2010 to 2015. Two variables are used for risk management including VAR (Value At Risk) and CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio). Family ownership, managerial ownership, and ownership concentration are used as instrumental variables for ownership structure. Board independence, the board size, CEO, and audit committee are used as proxy variables for corporate governance, whereas, dummy variables are used for bank performance. The results indicate that three types of bank ownerships are the same; therefore, they cannot affect VAR type of bank ownership and compare as a whole with risk management. The regression consequences display that family ownership has an unconstructive outcome on VAR and CAR that show a negative association between the variables. While managerial ownership and concentration ownership show a positive association between VAR and CAR. The results indicate that board size and audit committee has a negative effect on VAR and CAR that means there is a negative relationship between the variables, whereas board size and CEO have a positive relationship with VAR and CAR. Firm size, firm profitability, and growth opportunities represent a variety of bank performance. The results reveal that firm size, firm profitability and growth opportunities have a positive effect on CAR and VAR. The results also indicate that corporate governance has a positive effect on bank performance that means if a bank can adopt good corporate governance rules, the performance will be excellent. The result emphasizes that risk management has a positive correlation with bank performance that means if a bank manages risk, the performance of that bank will be increased. But in Pakistan, the rules and regulations are the same for all types of banks including private, public, and foreign, therefore, the ownership structures of all banks are the same.

Highlights

  • The board size, CEO, and audit committee are used as proxy variables for corporate governance, whereas, dummy variables are used for bank performance

  • The results indicate that board size and audit committee has a negative effect on Value At Risk (VAR) and Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) that means there is a negative relationship between the variables, whereas board size and CEO have a positive relationship with VAR and CAR

  • The results show the variable of ownership structure family ownership and managerial ownership have positively affected on ROA and EPS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1997, a big financial crisis hit on most the Asian countries including Pakistan. Due to this crisis, some Pakistani firms went to bankruptcy but some firms faced financial difficulties. Some Pakistani firms went to bankruptcy but some firms faced financial difficulties It is very difficult for these firms to convert debt into common stock. The Pakistani banking sector is the main part of these firms. Pakistani government invests huge amounts in banking sector to protect depositor’s money and save it from insolvency

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call