Abstract

The classic question in corporate governance is how to manage the conflicts-of-interest that arise from fundamental principal-agent problems. One of the most popular methods of solving the problem is by separating ownership and management. Since 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has set new standards for board composition by using independent directors, especially for audit committees. This article analyzes the impact of board composition, related to a majority of independent directors, on returns. For this purpose we construct a panel dataset of 2919 stocks over a 10 year period. We find that a majority of independent directors on the board has an overall negative effect on stock returns. We also use our panel data set to show the consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the defense or offense mechanisms that companies might pursue over their lifespan.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.