Abstract

The proposed paper discusses the evolution of corporate governance norms in India since the liberalization of the Indian economy, touching upon the Kumar Mangalam Committee Report, the Narayana Murthy Committee on Corporate Governance and clause 49 of the Listing Agreement. In particular, it identifies and critically analyzes the corporate governance changes brought in the new Companies Act enacted in 2013. Saliently, the Act has amended the definition of independent directors and made it stricter; it is submitted that a “principles-based” approach to defining independence may be better suited as the categories creating conflict of interest cannot be exhaustively enumerated. Similarly, the scope of limitation of liability for directors under this Act should have been extended to exempt outside directors from liability under all acts/laws as it has been observed anecdotally that outside directors face charges under other statutes like the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the various environmental laws et al. In other respects, the recognition of short form mergers is a welcome reform to the MA the stipulation of prescribed shareholding (and debt holding) thresholds to challenge MA however, the expression, “prejudicial to the company or members” as interpreted by Supreme Court earlier appears to prescribe a high onus of proof on the class action plaintiffs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call