Corporate governance and shareholder-employee risk-shifting: Evidence from corporate pension plan sponsors

Abstract

This study examines how corporate governance affects pension plan sponsors’ conflicting motives—risk-shifting vs. risk management—and their future pension funding status, R&D investments, and shareholder values. We focus on managers’ discretionary choices of expected rates of return on plan assets and discount rates for pension liabilities to capture risk-shifting motives and measure corporate governance quality through foreign equity ownership (strong monitoring) and stable equity ownership (weak monitoring). The evidence shows that well-governed firms use managerial risk-shifting to finance R&D and increase shareholder values. Risk-shifting by poorly-governed firms results in larger pension underfunding without increasing shareholder values.