Abstract

Corporate governance provides a fundamental framework to oversee corporate conduct and ensures transparency of institutions like banks. In case of Islamic banks, it adds additional importance as the profit sharing (with the depositors) system enhances the chance of agency problem for such institutions. Again, risks are inherent in institutions like Islamic banks, which necessitate the investors to get proper information about the risk encountered by the banks in which they invest. Thus, corporate governance and risk disclosures bear utmost importance. Since Malaysian banking industry has already experienced a favorable growth of Islamic banking and Bangladesh is observing a rapid growth of popularity of Islamic banking, a comparative study has been undertaken between Malaysian and Bangladeshi Islamic banks regarding corporate governance and risk disclosures in annual reports. Content analysis technique has been applied to facilitate the comparison. Both quantity and quality of risk reporting of the sample companies have been evaluated. A corporate governance disclosure index has been developed by following the guidelines provided by Bangladesh Security and Exchange Commission (BSEC) and the principles laid down in the ‘Guidelines on Corporate Governance for Licensed Islamic Banks in Malaysia’ to explore and compare the degree of good corporate governance and relevant disclosures in the annual reports. It is hypothesized that corporate governance and risk disclosure will vary between Malaysian and Bangladeshi Islamic Banks. It is also argued that the corporate risk disclosures will be positively associated with the quality of the firm’s corporate governance mechanisms. Results are generally supportive of hypotheses. At the end, implications for theory and practices are discussed in the study.

Highlights

  • Though a good number of studies have been conducted in recent years concerning risk disclosure in annual report, the area of risk reporting is still very much unexplored

  • It is accepted by a wide range of people that risk disclosures ensure transparency and boost investors‟ confidence resulting the benefits of better market performance. (Abraham and Cox, 2007; Abraham and Shrives, 2014; Cabedo and Tirado, 2004)

  • Though risk disclosure is the center of interest of a wide range of investors, researches have showed that the present risk reporting is not providing desired help to them and does not convey real meaning (Campbell & Slack, 2008; Moxey & Berendt, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Though a good number of studies have been conducted in recent years concerning risk disclosure in annual report, the area of risk reporting is still very much unexplored. The investors demand a tradeoff between the risk and return of investment and the financial reporting should contain information relevant to measure the risks and uncertainties concerning future performance of corporations. It is accepted by a wide range of people that risk disclosures ensure transparency and boost investors‟ confidence resulting the benefits of better market performance. A series of major corporate accounting fraud scandals has renewed interest among academics and policymakers in the issues of corporate governance and Corporate-sector integrity (McDonough, 2002)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call