Abstract

Microenterprise loans are commonly considered an effective way of having social impact at the base of the pyramid (BOP). We examine evidence for this in the context of a microfinance company, investigating how economic outcomes associated with loans meant for supporting microenterprises compare with those for other kinds of loans. While loans targeting income generation do in general exhibit better outcomes, these outcomes are at least as good for loans specifically funding traditional means of rural livelihood as for microenterprise loans. Within microenterprise loans, the outcomes are even worse for starting than growing microenterprises, pointing towards lack of complementary resources and skills as a bottleneck. These findings suggest a need to temper the emphasis on funding microenterprises as a preferred way of supporting BOP livelihoods.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.