Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the nature of the relationship between board structures (BSs) and intellectual capital (IC) of banks in Africa.Design/methodology/approachUsing annual data from financial statements of 366 banks from 26 African countries from 2007 to 2015, the study estimates IC using the value-added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) and BSs using board size, board independence and board gender diversity. The system generalized method of moments and panel-corrected standard error estimation strategies are used to estimate panel regressions.FindingsThere is a significant negative relationship between board independence and intellectual capital. The results also indicate that the IC of banks does not depend on board size and board gender diversity.Practical implicationsThe study's findings provide evidence of the extent to which BSs have been instituted to support investments in intellectual capital as a means of improving the performance of banks in Africa.Originality/valueThis study provides some empirical evidence from Africa's banking sector to justify that banks with better IC have boards that are less independent. This study is one of the few studies that employs many countries' data.

Highlights

  • Good corporate governance (CG) and intellectual capital (IC) have been progressively documented as some of the main drivers of economic growth and development in contemporary times

  • The results indicate that the IC of banks does not strongly depend on board size and board gender diversity

  • It could be deduced that banks in Africa are relatively small

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Good corporate governance (CG) and intellectual capital (IC) have been progressively documented as some of the main drivers of economic growth and development in contemporary times. As argued by Kaplan and Norton (2004), some high natural resource-endowed countries, such as Saudi Arabia and Venezuela as at made poor investments in their CG and IC They experienced many sluggish growths as their output per person was far less than countries like Taiwan and Singapore that had limited natural resources but invested profoundly in CG and IC (Kaplan and Norton, 2004). This argument could be juxtaposed to many African countries which have relatively lower investments in CG and IC.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call