Abstract

The value of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessment and coronary intervention in the prognosis of patients who undergo renal transplantation is controversial. We investigated whether pretransplant identification of patients with CAD is helpful for defining prognosis and whether preemptive coronary intervention reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events and death after engraftment. We analyzed the impact of coronary assessment by clinical stratification and coronary angiography and of coronary intervention on prognosis in 535 chronic kidney disease patients on the transplantation waiting list who underwent renal transplantation. Patients with 70% or greater narrowing experienced more coronary events than patients with less significant lesions (P = 0.01) and subjects at low risk (P = 0.001). Coronary assessment did not discriminate between the risk of death in patients with or without significant CAD, and the independent predictors of death were age (hazards ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.06, P = 0.001) and diabetes (hazards ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.39, P = 0.01). No difference occurred in events and mortality between patients treated medically or by intervention, but the severity of CAD was higher in the latter. Coronary assessment identified patients at increased risk of posttransplant coronary events and was also useful to define a low-risk population that may be safely transplanted without in-depth cardiovascular evaluation. However, it did not differentiate between the risk of death in patients with and those without significant CAD. Survival was similar in patients undergoing either medical or interventional treatment for CAD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call