Abstract

A definitive conclusion regarding whether on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass is preferable in young patients is lacking. The aim of our study was to perform a long-term comparison of the two approaches in young patients. We analyzed the National Health Insurance Research Database, using data for patients between 18 and 45 years of age who had undergone isolated coronary artery bypass between 2001 and 2011. The study endpoints were: all-cause death, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and repeat revascularization within 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, and the entire 10-year follow-up period. A total of 344 patients received off-pump surgery and 741 patients received on-pump surgery. Preoperative characteristics and comorbidities were similar in both groups, and all-cause mortality was almost equal (p = 0.716). The 5-year survival rates were 93.9% and 92.2% in the off-pump and on-pump groups, respectively, and the 10-year survival rates were 86.3% and 82.1%, respectively. The repeat revascularization rate was significantly lower in the on-pump group (p = 0.0407). Both the on-pump and off-pump methods offer equally good long-term outcomes in terms of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. However, the need for repeat revascularization is a concern in the long term after off-pump surgery.

Highlights

  • The efficacy and appropriate indications for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been a source of contention since its enthusiastic re-emergence in the 1990s [1]

  • Both groups were comprised of predominantly male patients, and mean age was similar in both groups

  • The emergent operations of both groups were similar; they accounted for 13.95% in the off-pump and 13.76% in the on-pump group (p = 0.41)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The efficacy and appropriate indications for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been a source of contention since its enthusiastic re-emergence in the 1990s [1]. Several large randomized trials have compared on-pump with off-pump CABG [2,3,4,5,6]. Young patients account for 3% of all patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and have a different background and propensity to elderly patients [8]. They are more likely to be male, smokers, obese, have a family history, and some of them have non-atherosclerotic diseases [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. There have been no studies comparing long-term outcomes between on-pump and off-pump CABG in young patients

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.