Coronary angioplasty in spontaneous coronary artery dissection—Strategy and outcomes

Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the clinical, angiographic and technical characteristics of patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MethodsThis was a retrospective single center study where patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD undergoing PCI over a period of 4 years (2013–2017) were analyzed. We also sought to identify the clinical and angiographic predictors of procedural failure during PCI. ResultsThere were a total of 42 patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD during the study period of which 16 patients (38.1%) underwent PCI. 14 out of the 16 patients (87.5%) taken up for PCI had technical success. In all patients the lesion was initially attempted to cross with a floppy wire and if unsuccessful it was escalated to a hydrophilic wire and finally to a stiff wire The SCAD lesion was crossed with a floppy wire in 71.4% of patients, with a hydrophilic wire in 14.2% and a stiff wire in 7.1% of patients. Wire escalation was required in 5 patients (31.3%) and in 60% of cases there was a technical success after wire escalation. Presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, coexisting atherosclerosis, diffuse nature of the lesion, and baseline Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)≤2 flow did not predict procedural failure during PCI. ConclusionPCI in SCAD is associated with a fair rate of technical success in our population. Choosing an initial floppy wire and then escalating to a hydrophilic wire followed by a stiff wire is an optimal revascularization strategy.