Abstract
Objectives. We sought to compare the short- and long-term mortality rates in patients ≥70 years old with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with predicted coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) short-term and U.S. census long-term mortality rates.Background. Coronary angioplasty is an alternative revascularization strategy for patients with medically refractory rest angina and a high risk of adverse outcomes with CABG. Patients ≥70 years old are a specific high risk subset.Methods. A total of 131 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years with unstable angina underwent PTCA; 82 (62%) of 131 had been refused CABG. Mortality over time was obtained from the Veterans Affairs Beneficiary Index Records Locator Subsystem. Predicted 30-day CABG-associated mortality was obtained from the Veterans Affairs Cardiac Risk Assessment Model. Mortality over time was expressed with Kaplan-Meier curves.Results. The observed 30-day angioplasty survival rate was 87% compared with the predicted surgical 30-day survival rate of 85.5%. In those patients who survived 6 months after angioplasty (84%), their subsequent 1-, 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-year survival rates were comparable to age-matched subjects in the U.S. census. Mortality in certain subsets known to be at very high risk for CABG—for example, patients who had a previous CABG—was not high in this cohort of elderly subjects. The extremely high risk subsets identified in this PTCA cohort (shock, heart failure, pressors required, balloon pump required) were relatively infrequent subsets.Conclusions. For selected elderly patients with unstable angina deemed to be at “high risk” or even “prohibitive risk” for CABG, PTCA is an alternative revascularization strategy. The long-term mortality of successfully treated elderly patients is comparable to age-matched subjects. A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of CABG versus PTCA, which includes patients ≥70 years old, is being conducted (Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 385: AWESOME).(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:339–44)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.