Coronal knee alignment measurements differ on long-standing radiographs vs. by navigation

Abstract

BackgroundThe long-standing radiograph (LSR) is the reference tool for assessing knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its value is debatable, as many factors can influence measurement accuracy. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) provides accurate measurements. Few studies have compared LSR and computer-assisted measurements of knee alignment. The objective of this study was to compare hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle values obtained before and after TKA on LSRs to those obtained during CAS. HypothesisThe HKA angle values measured on LSRs before and after surgery are identical to those measured during CAS. Material and methodsThe HKA angles of 126 knees were measured on bipedal full-weight-bearing LSRs obtained before and 3 months after TKA. The results were compared to the values obtained during CAS. ResultsBefore surgery, the standard deviation was 2.672, with limits of agreement of {−5.391; + 5.082}. The intra-class coefficients were good for the overall measurements (0.9), good for detecting>10° varus (0.89), fair for<10° varus and valgus (0.66 and 0.71, respectively), poor for>10° valgus (0.43) and poor for normal alignment (0). Post-operatively, the standard deviation was 3.113, with limits of agreement of {−6.426; +5.776}. The intra-class coefficient was poor for the overall measurements (0.20), negative for normal alignment (−0.05) and<10° valgus (−0.05), and positive for<10° varus (0.017) and for>10° varus and valgus (0.33). ConclusionBefore TKA, the LSR overestimates the deformity compared to CAS. After surgery, the two methods are not comparable. These findings underline the relevance of routinely obtaining LSRs and for using LSR results to estimate costs for healthcare insurance reimbursement purposes. Level of evidenceIV, retrospective observational cohort study.