Abstract

BackgroundInstruments for monitoring the clinical status of adolescents with emotional problems are needed. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) according to theory measures problems/symptoms, well-being, functioning and risk. Documentation of whether the theoretical factor structure for CORE-OM is applicable for adolescents is lacking.MethodsThis study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of the CORE-OM based on two samples of adolescents (age 14–18): youths seeking treatment for emotional problems (N = 140) and high school students (N = 531). A split half approach was chosen. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the first half of the stratified samples to establish the suitability of the model. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with the chosen model from the EFA was performed on the second half. Internal consistency and clinical cut-off scores of the CORE-OM were investigated.ResultsThe best fitting model only partially confirmed the theoretical model for the CORE-OM. The model consisted of five factors: 1) General problems, 2) risk to self, 3) positive resources 4) risk to others and 5) problems with others. The clinical cut-off score based on the all-item total was higher than in an adult sample. Both the all-item total and general problems cut-off scores showed gender differences.ConclusionThe factor analysis on CORE-OM for adolescents resulted in a five-factor solution, and opens up for new subscales concerning positive resources and problems with others. A 17-item solution for the general problems/symptoms scale is suggested. We advise developers of self-report instruments not to reverse items, if they do not intend to measure a separate factor, since these seem to affect the dimensionality of the scales. Comparing means for gender in non-clinical samples should not be done without modification of the general emotional problem and the positive resources scales. Slightly elevated CORE-OM scores (up to 1.3) in adolescents may be normal fluctuations.

Highlights

  • Instruments for monitoring the clinical status of adolescents with emotional problems are needed

  • The aims of this paper were to study the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in an adolescent clinical sample selected for emotional problems and a non-clinical sample by (I) Investigating the factor structure of the Norwegian CORE-OM in adolescents aged 14 to 18 years, by establishing the suitability of the model by Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and performing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with the chosen model of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

  • The EFA resulted in a five factor solution, and the factor contents were interpreted as general problems, positive resources, risk to self, risk to others, and problems with others

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Instruments for monitoring the clinical status of adolescents with emotional problems are needed. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) according to theory measures problems/ symptoms, well-being, functioning and risk. There is a call for screening tools that can detect mental health problems in adolescents and determine their clinical status. The self-report Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a 34-item questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most of the time). The CORE-OM theoretically covers four dimensions: Well-being (4 items); Functioning (12 items); Problems/symptoms (12 items); and Risk (6 items) [6, 7]. It has been recommended that risk be monitored separately to help the clinician detect a patient’s thoughts and plans regarding self-harm, suicide and violence [10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call