Abstract
In this paper, the comparison between conventional and data-driven control performance assessment (CPA) indices in application to the heating process is presented. Based on the realistic simulation results for differently tuned single-loop PI/PID based control systems, the chosen CPA measures are computed and compared in terms of ability to load disturbance rejection. Then, the correlation between conventional CPA indices (maximum overshoot, settling time and integral indices) and data-driven methods (minimum variance (MV) and general minimum variance (GMV) indices) is presented. The results show that in some cases, data-driven CPA methods can be replaced by less complex conventional CPA indices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
