Abstract
Summary This paper presents an evaluation of two fundamentally different stress models: an elastic model, which is based on linear transverse isotropic elasticity, and a failure model, which is based on the concept that rocks are in an equilibrium state of shear failure. The models arc evaluated by using physical parameters measured on core, pore pressure, and in-situ stress data from the Gas Research Institute (GRI) Staged Field Experiments (SFE's) in east Texas. It is shown that the elastic and failure models provide satisfactory predictions for most of the lithologies encountered. However, the failure model is more accurate for predicting stress in soft shales. An example of stress predictions based on log-derived elasticity parameters that gives stress estimations comparable to core-based predictions is also shown.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.