Abstract
Objectives:The aim of this study was to compare the effects of core stabilization exercises and conventional rehabilitation exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of knee joint laxity, knee muscle strength, postural stability and functional tests.Methods:Twenty eight patients reconstructed with hamstring tendon were included. Thirteen patients evaluated after a conventional rehabilitation and fifteen after a core stabilization programme. Single-limb postural stability assessment, isokinetic knee muscle strength test, instrumented ligament laxity test, functional hop tests were done to both groups after 16th week. Single-limb postural stability was assessed with stabilometer in both eyes open and eyes-closed conditions. Healthy legs were evaluated as internal controls.Results:Knee flexor and extensor strength indices were not different between groups (p>.05). H/Q strength ratio was different at 180 °/s (p<.05). Knee laxity was not different between groups (p<.05). There was no significant difference in hop distance and hop index between groups (p>.05). Conventional training group had deficit in overall stability score in eyes closed condition (p>.05), but core stabilization group did not have any postural stability deficit (p>.05).Conclusion:Better H/Q strength ratio was seen in core stabilization group. Core stabilization exercises improved postural stability more than classic rehabilitation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.