Abstract

We show how the initial subnational entry location of foreign multinational enterprises (MNEs) in China influences their subsequent within-country location choices and expansion speed. We distinguish between MNEs that establish their first subsidiary in co-ethnic cores – dense agglomerations of other firms from the same country of origin – and MNEs that locate their first subsidiary in the periphery, i.e., outside of these co-ethnic cores. To identify co-ethnic cores in China, we employ a geo-visualization methodology, which draws the boundaries of cores organically and dynamically over time. We contrast our findings with the prevailing approach of using static administrative boundaries for identifying agglomerations. Our results provide evidence of path dependency, in that (a) entry through subnational locations with strong co-ethnic communities is followed by expansion into other locations where co-ethnic communities are present, and that (b) entry through co-ethnic communities accelerates the pace at which MNEs establish additional subsidiaries in China. We also find that co-ethnic community effects continue to influence within-country MNE activities over time, despite a host of economic, institutional, and investment developments.

Highlights

  • There is growing interest among international business (IB) scholars in the characteristics and effects of foreign multinational enterprise (MNE) agglomerations, including those based on a shared country of origin (Kim, 2015; Tan & Meyer, 2011; Zhu, Eden, Miller, Thomas, & Fields, 2012)

  • We focus on the latter stream and answer the question: How does an initial entry through a co-ethnic community influence MNEs’ subsequent subnational location choices and expansion speed within the same host country? We draw on the co-ethnicity perspective from economic sociology (Levitt, 2004; Polanyi, Arensberg, & Pearson, 1957; Light, 1972, 1983; Portes & Sensenbrenner, 1993; Rezaei, 2011) and logics from research on the effects of social and geographic proximity (Boschma, 2005; Tong, 2005)

  • In Model 2, the odds ratio associated with subsidiary 1 core is significantly greater than one (p \ 0.05), indicating that the odds of a second subsidiary being in a co-ethnic core are higher for MNEs whose first subsidiary was in a co-ethnic core than for MNEs whose first subsidiary was in the periphery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is growing interest among international business (IB) scholars in the characteristics and effects of foreign multinational enterprise (MNE) agglomerations, including those based on a shared country of origin (Kim, 2015; Tan & Meyer, 2011; Zhu, Eden, Miller, Thomas, & Fields, 2012). A second stream investigates coethnic agglomerations – MNEs from a single country of origin and the co-ethnic communities that can form within them (e.g., Dana, Etemad, & Wright, 2008; Guillen, 2002; Head, Ries, & Swenson, 1995; Henisz & Delios, 2001; Hernandez, 2014; Kim, 2015; Miller, Thomas, Eden, & Hitt, 2008; Rangan & Sengul, 2009; Tan & Meyer, 2011) We focus on the latter stream and answer the question: How does an initial entry through a co-ethnic community influence MNEs’ subsequent subnational location choices and expansion speed within the same host country? Our research responds to calls for finer-grained analyses of subnational MNE locationchoice effects with the goal of improving the specification of IB models (Cantwell & Brannen, 2011; Cantwell, Dunning, & Lundan, 2010; Chan, Makino & Isobe, 2010; Lorenzen & Mudambi, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call