Core needle biopsy and ultrasonography are superior to fine needle aspiration in the management of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas.

Abstract

Follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) is a problematic entity. FVPTCs are often misdiagnosed by the standard fine needle aspiration (FNA); in addition, FVPTCs represent a mixed group of tumors with two biologically distinct subtypes: The indolent encapsulated FVPTC and the aggressive infiltrative FVPTC. Recent changes in guidelines suggests that FVPTC management may be improved if subtypes can be determined preoperatively. Preoperative assays, FNA, core needle biopsy (CNB), and ultrasonography (US) were compared for their ability to identify and subtype FVPTCs to determine the most appropriate test to manage FVPTCs. The preoperative assays and clinicopathologic variables of 255 resected FVPTCs cases at Samsung Medical Center between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. CNB had the overall best ability to manage FVPTCs with the highest rate of diagnosis indicating surgery, lowest rate of inconclusive results, high sensitivity (88.9%), specificity (87.7%), negative predictive value (97.0%), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR; 56.9), and excellent predictive ability (AUC 0.906) for differentiating FVPTC subtypes. US had a moderate DOR (12.8), good predictive ability (AUC 0.802), high sensitivity (75.0%) and specificity (81.0%). CNB and US both had significantly higher accuracy for discriminating FVPTC subtypes than FNA (AUC 0.908 and 0.877 > 0.671; p < 0.05). The excellent performance of CNB could be attributed to distinct histologic differences between FVPTC subtypes. CNB and US had superior performance to FNA in the identification and subtyping of FVPTC. In institutions with skilled and experienced operators, CNB is the preferred method for evaluating possible FVPTC lesions.