Abstract

Systematic conservation planning (SCP) is a field of conservation biology concerned with delivering on-the-ground actions that achieve conservation goals. It describes a set of operational models that cover both design and implementation of conservation, with a strong focus on mobilising the collective action typically required to implement conservation. SCP, as it was originally described, was composed of six different stages: collection of data, identification of conservation goals, evaluation of the existing protected area network, design of expansions, implementation of conservation action, and long-term maintenance of biodiversity in the network. Since then, the operational model has been expanded into several different variants. Conservation actions applied inside SCP include establishment and expansion of reserve networks and allocation of habitat restoration and management.Within the broader context of SCP, there is a fundamental biogeographic-economic analysis frequently called spatial conservation prioritisation or conservation assessment, which is used for identifying where important areas for biodiversity are and how conservation goals might be achieved efficiently. Here, we review the usage and meaning of the 12 biogeographic-economic core concepts of SCP: adequacy, complementarity, comprehensiveness, effectiveness, efficiency, flexibility, irreplaceability, replacement cost, representation, representativeness, threat, and vulnerability. Some of the concepts have clear definitions whereas others may have alternative and possibly conflicting definitions. With a comprehensive literature review literature, we elucidate the historical backgrounds of these concepts, the first definitions and usages, alternative later definitions, key applications, and prior reviews. This review reduces linguistic uncertainty in the application of SCP. Since SCP is a global activity with a multitude of different stakeholders involved, it is vital that those involved can speak the same language. Through these concepts, this review serves as a source of information about the historical development of SCP. It provides a comprehensive review for anyone wishing to understand the key concepts of spatial prioritisation within SCP.

Highlights

  • Systematic conservation planning (SCP) is widely considered as the most influential paradigm to identify and bring under protection priority areas for conservation (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Knight, Cowling & Campbell, 2006a; Pressey & Bottrill, 2009; Knight et al, 2010; Sarkar & Illoldi-Rangel, 2010)

  • This review reduces linguistic uncertainty in the application of SCP

  • The fundamental conceptual basis and process of SCP can be dated to that time; its original operational model was influentially summarised by Margules & Pressey (2000)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Systematic conservation planning (SCP) is widely considered as the most influential paradigm to identify and bring under protection priority areas for conservation (Margules & Pressey, 2000; Knight, Cowling & Campbell, 2006a; Pressey & Bottrill, 2009; Knight et al, 2010; Sarkar & Illoldi-Rangel, 2010). Within SCP there is a fundamental biogeographic-economic activity of identifying important areas for biodiversity; where, when and how we might efficiently achieve conservation goals (Pressey et al, 2007; Wilson et al, 2007; Ferrier & Wintle, 2009) This activity can be called spatial conservation prioritisation and is our present focus. The eighth stage of SCP concerns evaluation of the existing protected area network, i.e. assesses current achievement of previously developed objectives At this stage the technique of gap analysis is frequently used, to identify deficiencies in the conservation coverage of biodiversity (Scott et al, 1993; Kiester et al, 1996; Rodrigues et al, 2004a). The ninth stage of SCP fundamentally concerns the biogeographical activity of spatial conservation prioritisation or conservation assessment It requires identifying important areas for protected area network expansion or management (Pressey & Bottrill, 2009). We undertake a comprehensive review of the core concepts of spatial prioritisation within SCP, reducing linguistic uncertainty around these concepts, and supporting urgent global conservation efforts by improving the accessibility of this major field of conservation biology

METHODS
RESULTS
CRITICISMS AND CLARIFICATIONS OF THE CONCEPTS
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.