Abstract
In the paper I argue against content pluralism as a solution of one specific problem Corazza and Korta deal with in their joint paper ?Frege on subject matter and identity statements? (Analysis, 2015). Corazza and Korta test the idea of content plurality by its capacity to deal with Frege?s puzzle about identity statements but, I will claim, it doesn?t pass the test. In particular, I propose an understanding of subject matter in Frege as related to his judgment stroke. I distinguish two senses of ?subject matter? in Corazza and Korta, and argue that their solution of Frege?s puzzle is inconsistent.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
