Abstract

Coral restoration is rapidly becoming a mainstream strategic reef management response to address dramatic declines in coral cover worldwide. Restoration success can be defined as enhanced reef functions leading to improved ecosystem services, with multiple benefits at socio-ecological scales. However, there is often a mismatch between the objectives of coral restoration programs and the metrics used to assess their effectiveness. In particular, the scales of ecological benefits currently assessed are typically limited in both time and space, often being limited to short-term monitoring of the growth and survival of transplanted corals. In this paper, we explore reef-scale responses of coral assemblages to restoration practices applied in four well-established coral restoration programs. We found that hard coral cover and structural complexity were consistently greater at restored compared to unrestored (degraded) sites. However, patterns in coral diversity, coral recruitment, and coral health among restored, unrestored, and reference sites varied across locations, highlighting differences in methodologies among restoration programs. Altogether, differences in program objectives, methodologies, and the state of nearby coral communities were key drivers of variability in the responses of coral assemblages to restoration. The framework presented here provides guidance to improve qualitative and quantitative assessments of coral restoration efforts and can be applied to further understanding of the role of restoration within resilience-based reef management.

Highlights

  • The number of coral restoration programs is burgeoning in most reef regions in response to worldwide declines in coral cover in recent years [1,2,3]

  • All five indicators surveyed positively increased in restored treatments in Koh Tao, where the restoration design includes a mix of direct transplantation and a variety of artificial structures

  • This combination of techniques led to the highest rate of increase in structural complexity, coral generic diversity, number of juveniles, and improved coral health at restored compared to unrestored treatments of all study locations (Figure 11)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of coral restoration programs is burgeoning in most reef regions in response to worldwide declines in coral cover in recent years [1,2,3]. Common objectives of these programs are Diversity 2020, 12, 153; doi:10.3390/d12040153 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity. A recent review of coral restoration efforts globally revealed a lack of appropriate and standardized monitoring of outcomes, with too short timeframes (median monitoring time of 12 months) to assess the potential of using restoration as a tool for resilience-based management [5]. Many studies are focused on site- or region-specific restoration programs [9,10], which has made comparative studies difficult and limited the development of broad best-practice recommendations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call