Abstract

Abstract. The structural framework provided by corals is crucial for reef ecosystem function and services, but high seawater temperatures can be detrimental to the calcification capacity of reef-building organisms. The Red Sea is very warm, but total alkalinity (TA) is naturally high and beneficial for reef accretion. To date, we know little about how such detrimental and beneficial abiotic factors affect each other and the balance between calcification and erosion on Red Sea coral reefs, i.e., overall reef growth, in this unique ocean basin. To provide estimates of present-day reef growth dynamics in the central Red Sea, we measured two metrics of reef growth, i.e., in situ net-accretion/-erosion rates (Gnet) determined by deployment of limestone blocks and ecosystem-scale carbonate budgets (Gbudget), along a cross-shelf gradient (25 km, encompassing nearshore, midshore, and offshore reefs). Along this gradient, we assessed multiple abiotic (i.e., temperature, salinity, diurnal pH fluctuation, inorganic nutrients, and TA) and biotic (i.e., calcifier and epilithic bioeroder communities) variables. Both reef growth metrics revealed similar patterns from nearshore to offshore: net-erosive, neutral, and net-accretion states. The average cross-shelf Gbudget was 0.66 kg CaCO3 m−2 yr−1, with the highest budget of 2.44 kg CaCO3 m−2 yr−1 measured in the offshore reef. These data are comparable to the contemporary Gbudgets from the western Atlantic and Indian oceans, but lie well below “optimal reef production” (5–10 kg CaCO3 m−2 yr−1) and below maxima recently recorded in remote high coral cover reef sites. However, the erosive forces observed in the Red Sea nearshore reef contributed less than observed elsewhere. A higher TA accompanied reef growth across the shelf gradient, whereas stronger diurnal pH fluctuations were associated with negative carbonate budgets. Noteworthy for this oligotrophic region was the positive effect of phosphate, which is a central micronutrient for reef building corals. While parrotfish contributed substantially to bioerosion, our dataset also highlights coralline algae as important local reef builders. Altogether, our study establishes a baseline for reef growth in the central Red Sea that should be useful in assessing trajectories of reef growth capacity under current and future ocean scenarios.

Highlights

  • Coral reef growth is mostly limited to warm, aragonitesaturated, and oligotrophic tropical oceans and is pivotal for reef ecosystem functioning (Buddemeier, 1997; Kleypas et al, 1999)

  • Net-accretion/-erosion rates Gnet were measured in limestone block assays over periods of 6, 12, and 30 months in the reef sites along the cross-shelf gradient

  • Gnet based on the 30-month deployment of blocks ranged between −0.96 and 0.37 kg CaCO3 m−2 yr−1 (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coral reef growth is mostly limited to warm, aragonitesaturated, and oligotrophic tropical oceans and is pivotal for reef ecosystem functioning (Buddemeier, 1997; Kleypas et al, 1999). Erosion, and dissolution contribute to the formation of the reef framework constructed of calcium carbonate (CaCO3, mainly aragonite). The export or loss of carbonate as sediments is considered an essential part, in particular in the wider geomorphic perspective of reef carbonate production states (Cyronak et al, 2013; Perry et al, 2008, 2017). Temperature and carbonate chemistry parameters (e.g., pH, total alkalinity: TA, aragonite saturation state: a, and pCO2) have been identified as important players in regulating these carbonate accretion and erosion processes (Albright et al, 2018; Schönberg et al, 2017). Different light regimes across depths, water flow, and wave exposure can alter the rates of reef-formation processes (Dullo et al, 1995; Glynn and Manzello, 2015; Kleypas et al, 2001)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call