Abstract
This article discusses the thought color and methods of ijtihad of Ibn Taymiyyah, one of the most influential figures in the movement of of Islamic thought renewal. He raised a number of criticisms of the logician. The arguments he used indicated that he is a thinker of empiricism. This empiricism complexion coloring intellectual works in various fields. In the field of fiqh, in the beginning he was a follower of the school of Hanbaliyah, however, in further development he performed ijtihad independently without being tied down by other schools. That is why Ibn Taymiyya was known as a mujtahid mutlaq. Although in performing ijtihad he remains grounded in the Qur’an and Sunnah as well as admits the ijmA¢â€™ and qiyA¢s as a source of Islamic law, his thoughts are often different from other scholars of his time, both on the aspect of methodology and the results of his ijtihad.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.