Abstract

Copula modelling is a popular tool in analysing the dependencies between variables. Copula modelling allows the investigation of tail dependencies, which is of particular interest in risk and survival applications. Copula modelling is also of specific interest to economic and financial modelling as it can help in the prediction of financial contagion and periods of “boom” or “bust”. Bivariate copula modelling has a rich variety of copulas that may be chosen to represent the modelled dataset dependencies and possible extreme events that may lie within the dataset tails. Financial copula modelling tends to diverge as this richness of copula types within the literature may not be well realised with the two different types of modelling, one being non-time-series and the other being time-series, being undertaken differently. This paper investigates standard copula modelling and financial copula modelling and shows why the modelling strategies in using time-series and non-time-series copula modelling is undertaken using different methods. This difference, apart from the issues surrounding the time-series component, is mostly due to standard copula modelling having the ability to use empirical CDFs for the probability integral transformation. Financial time-series copula modelling uses pseudo-CDFs due to the standardized time-series residuals being centred around zero. The standardized residuals inhibit the estimation of the possible distributions required for constructing the copula model in the usual manner.

Highlights

  • It is often stated within the literature that the Gaussian (Normal) copula is to blame for the financial crash of 2007 and 2008

  • Zimmer (2012) highlights that the Gaussian copula’s inability to account for tail dependence limits its use in estimating relationships in housing price movements that can lead to model miss-specification, which is what happened in the financial crash of 2007 and 2008

  • Fermanian (2017) due to the time-dependence; significant advances have been observed in terms of copula modelling of univariate and multivariate time-series

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is often stated within the literature that the Gaussian (Normal) copula is to blame for the financial crash of 2007 and 2008. This general statement is a bit of an oddity, as copula modelling can be a virtually automated process. Zimmer (2012) highlights that the Gaussian copula’s inability to account for tail dependence limits its use in estimating relationships in housing price movements that can lead to model miss-specification, which is what happened in the financial crash of 2007 and 2008. Measuring the co-movements and tail dependence structures and determining the volatility spill-over and evolution over time is essential in risk management, diversification and pricing, see Mensah and Adam (2020)

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call