Abstract

Traditional bivariate meta-analyses adopt the bivariate normal model. As the bivariate normal distribution produces symmetric dependence, it is not flexible enough to describe the true dependence structure of real meta-analyses. As an alternative to the bivariate normal model, recent papers have adopted “copula” models for bivariate meta-analyses. Copulas consist of both symmetric copulas (e.g., the normal copula) and asymmetric copulas (e.g., the Clayton copula). While copula models are promising, there are only a few studies on copula-based bivariate meta-analysis. Therefore, the goal of this article is to fully develop the methodologies and theories of the copula-based bivariate meta-analysis, specifically for estimating the common mean vector. This work is regarded as a generalization of our previous methodological/theoretical studies under the FGM copula to a broad class of copulas. In addition, we develop a new R package, “CommonMean.Copula”, to implement the proposed methods. Simulations are performed to check the proposed methods. Two real dataset are analyzed for illustration, demonstrating the insufficiency of the bivariate normal model.

Highlights

  • Bivariate outcomes often arise in meta-analyses on scientific studies, such as education and medicine

  • We evaluated the coverage probability (CP) of the 95% confidence interval (CI) (CE) to see how the confidence set can cover the true value

  • Our analysis clearly shows the insufficiency of the bivariate normal model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bivariate outcomes often arise in meta-analyses on scientific studies, such as education and medicine. Educational researchers may analyze bivariate exam scores on verbal and mathematics [1,2], or on mathematics and statistics [3]. Bivariate meta-analyses are statistical methods designed for these metaanalytical studies [6]. Dependence between two outcomes should be considered while performing bivariate meta-analyses. Dependence itself can be of clinical importance, e.g., dependence between two survival outcomes in meta-analysis [8,9,10,11]. This section reviews the literature on bivariate meta-analyses and the concept of copulas. We review the bivariate meta-analysis method for bivariate continuous outcomes [6,27].

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.