Abstract
Traditional bivariate meta-analyses adopt the bivariate normal model. As the bivariate normal distribution produces symmetric dependence, it is not flexible enough to describe the true dependence structure of real meta-analyses. As an alternative to the bivariate normal model, recent papers have adopted “copula” models for bivariate meta-analyses. Copulas consist of both symmetric copulas (e.g., the normal copula) and asymmetric copulas (e.g., the Clayton copula). While copula models are promising, there are only a few studies on copula-based bivariate meta-analysis. Therefore, the goal of this article is to fully develop the methodologies and theories of the copula-based bivariate meta-analysis, specifically for estimating the common mean vector. This work is regarded as a generalization of our previous methodological/theoretical studies under the FGM copula to a broad class of copulas. In addition, we develop a new R package, “CommonMean.Copula”, to implement the proposed methods. Simulations are performed to check the proposed methods. Two real dataset are analyzed for illustration, demonstrating the insufficiency of the bivariate normal model.
Highlights
Bivariate outcomes often arise in meta-analyses on scientific studies, such as education and medicine
We evaluated the coverage probability (CP) of the 95% confidence interval (CI) (CE) to see how the confidence set can cover the true value
Our analysis clearly shows the insufficiency of the bivariate normal model
Summary
Bivariate outcomes often arise in meta-analyses on scientific studies, such as education and medicine. Educational researchers may analyze bivariate exam scores on verbal and mathematics [1,2], or on mathematics and statistics [3]. Bivariate meta-analyses are statistical methods designed for these metaanalytical studies [6]. Dependence between two outcomes should be considered while performing bivariate meta-analyses. Dependence itself can be of clinical importance, e.g., dependence between two survival outcomes in meta-analysis [8,9,10,11]. This section reviews the literature on bivariate meta-analyses and the concept of copulas. We review the bivariate meta-analysis method for bivariate continuous outcomes [6,27].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.