Abstract
Some copper(II) complexes of the type [Cu(L1–3)(phen]⋅CH2Cl2 (1a–3a) and [Cu(L1–3) (bipy)]⋅CH2Cl2 (1b–3b) (where L1=N-(2-{[(2E)-2-(2-Hydroxy-benzylidene)-hydrazino]carbonyl}phenyl)benzamide, L2=N-(2-{[(2E)-2-(2-Hydroxy-(5-bromo)-benzylidene)-hydrazino]carbonyl}phenyl)benzamide, L3=N-(2-{[(2E)-2-(2-Hydroxy-(5-methoxy)-benzylidene)-hydrazino]carbonyl}phenyl)benzamide; phen=1,10-phenanthroline, bipy=2,2′-bipyridine) have been prepared and characterized on the basis of elemental analyses, IR, UV–Vis and EPR spectral studies. IR spectra indicate that the ligand L1–3 exists in the keto form in the solid state, while at the time of complexation, it tautomerises into enol form. The single crystal X-ray diffraction study of the representative complex [Cu(L1) (phen)]⋅CH2Cl2 (1a) reveals the distorted square pyramidal geometry around copper(II). Crystal data of (1a): space group=P21/n, a=11.5691(16)Å, b=11.0885(15)Å, c=24.890(4)Å, V=3166.2(8)Å3, Z=4. The electrochemical behavior of all the complexes indicate that the phen complexes appears at more positive potential as compared to those for bipy complexes, as a consequence of its stronger π acidic character. All the complexes exhibit blue–green emission as a result of the fluorescence from the intra-ligand (π→π∗) emission excited state.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.