Abstract
COP26 was noteworthy for a shift in attitude toward the kind of worldwide action that is essential to address the climate crisis effectively. More governments and industries are saying the right things. However, like the 25 preceding COPs, COP26 failed to reach agreement that will soon cut global GHG pollution, let alone prevent dangerous climate change. It was another example of the trudging negotiations and tenuous promises that have characterized climate diplomacy over three decades. To avoid decades more of plodding climate diplomacy, something needs to change. The twenty-sixth conference of the parties (COP26) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which met in Glasgow, Scotland, last November, was billed as the most important episode in climate diplomacy since the 2015 Paris Agreement. In the event, it was another example of the trudging negotiations and tenuous promises that have characterized climate diplomacy over three decades.
Highlights
COP26 was noteworthy for a shift in attitude toward the kind of worldwide action that is essential to address the climate crisis effectively
The eternally weak pulse of climate diplomacy would be without COP26, it was probably a success
If one’s measure of success is concrete action to achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement, let alone to end the climate crisis, it was almost certainly a failure
Summary
If one’s measure of success is that GHG emissions and global warming are unlikely to be quite as bad as they The eternally weak pulse of climate diplomacy would be without COP26, it was probably a success. If one’s measure of success is concrete action to achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement, let alone to end the climate crisis, it was almost certainly a failure.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
