Abstract

The α-Proteobacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens has proteins homologous to known regulators that govern cell division and development in Caulobacter crescentus, many of which are also conserved among diverse α-Proteobacteria. In light of recent work demonstrating similarity between the division cycle of C. crescentus and that of A. tumefaciens, the functional conservation for this presumptive control pathway was examined. In C. crescentus the CtrA response regulator serves as the master regulator of cell cycle progression and cell division. CtrA activity is controlled by an integrated pair of multi-component phosphorelays: PleC/DivJ-DivK and CckA-ChpT-CtrA. Although several of the conserved orthologues appear to be essential in A. tumefaciens, deletions in pleC or divK were isolated and resulted in cell division defects, diminished swimming motility, and a decrease in biofilm formation. A. tumefaciens also has two additional pleC/divJ homologue sensor kinases called pdhS1 and pdhS2, absent in C. crescentus. Deletion of pdhS1 phenocopied the ΔpleC and ΔdivK mutants. Cells lacking pdhS2 morphologically resembled wild-type bacteria, but were decreased in swimming motility and elevated for biofilm formation, suggesting that pdhS2 may serve to regulate the motile to non-motile switch in A. tumefaciens. Genetic analysis suggests that the PleC/DivJ-DivK and CckA-ChpT-CtrA phosphorelays in A. tumefaciens are vertically-integrated, as in C. crescentus. A gain-of-function mutation in CckA (Y674D) was identified as a spontaneous suppressor of the ΔpleC motility phenotype. Thus, although the core architecture of the A. tumefaciens pathway resembles that of C. crescentus there are specific differences including additional regulators, divergent pathway architecture, and distinct target functions.

Highlights

  • Developmental and morphological asymmetry is critical to the lifestyle of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes

  • Individual splicing by overlap extension (SOE) fragments were sub-cloned into the pNPTS138 suicide vector carrying kanamycin resistance and E. coli sacB-mediated sucrose sensitivity. pNPTS138 is a ColE1 plasmid and as such is unable to replicate in A. tumefaciens

  • Cell division in A. tumefaciens proceeds through an asymmetric budding process during which the future site of cell division appears as a sub-polar constriction where FtsZ localizes [32]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developmental and morphological asymmetry is critical to the lifestyle of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Work in several experimental systems has begun to detail, at the molecular level, examples of cellular asymmetries among both Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria [1,2]. Bacterial cell division provides one striking example [3]. The ‘old’ pole is inherited from the mother cell while the ‘new’ pole arises from the FtsZ-generated division septum. Related to this asymmetry, in many bacteria there is preferential localization of certain structures to a single pole, including flagella, pili, and secretion systems [4]. The proper assembly and distribution of these polar functionalities are critical for these bacteria to interact with one another and with their environment

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call