Abstract

Collective movement of social groups requires coordination between individuals. When cohesion is imperative, consensus must be reached, and specific individuals may exert disproportionate influence during decision-making. Animals living in multi-level societies, however, often split into consistent social subunits during travel, which may impact group coordination processes. We studied collective movement in the socially tolerant multi-level society of Guinea baboons (Papio papio). Using 146 group departures and 100 group progressions from 131 Guinea baboons ranging in Senegal’s Niokolo-Koba National Park, we examined individual success at initiating group departures and position within progressions. Two-thirds of attempted departures were initiated by adult males and one third by adult females. Both sexes were equally successful at initiating departures (> 80% of initiations). During group progressions, bachelor males were predominantly found in front, while reproductively active ‘primary’ males and females were observed with similar frequency across the whole group. The pattern of collective movement in Guinea baboons was more similar to those described for baboons living in uni-level societies than to hamadryas baboons, the only other multi-level baboon species, where males initiate and decide almost all group departures. Social organization alone therefore does not determine which category of individuals influence group coordination.

Highlights

  • Collective movement of social groups requires coordination between individuals

  • A core question in studies of collective movement is whether specific individuals exert disproportionate influence on group movement

  • We provide evidence that the Guinea baboons in our study population coordinate collective movements through partially shared consensus, where most adult group members can successfully initiate group departures and move at the front of group m­ ovements[68]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Collective movement of social groups requires coordination between individuals. When cohesion is imperative, consensus must be reached, and specific individuals may exert disproportionate influence during decision-making. Instances of leadership have been identified both at the start of travel, when individuals attempt to initiate group d­ epartures[12,17,18,19,20,21], and while in motion, when individuals can occupy positions of increased influence, such as the f­ront[7,8,22,23,24,25], or ­rear[26,27] of group progressions. When power differentials are absent, leadership is often more evenly distributed, as in the tolerant, egalitarian society of Tonkean macaques (M. tonkeana), where individuals are likely to follow any group member, and group progressions exhibit no particular ­order[13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call