Abstract

River basin planning under the European Water Framework Directive (2000/60/CE, WFD) poses two major challenges to EU countries: coordination among administrative units for large-scale river basin planning and the inclusion of interested parties in decision-making processes. To face both challenges, many Member States have established Coordination and Participation Boards at the River Basin District or river basin level. These boards can be defined as multi-agency and multi-actor groups that support the development of inclusive and coordinated river basin planning to comply with the WFD requirements. The aim of this paper is to understand the functioning and effectiveness of the coordination and participation boards in promoting participatory river basin planning in seven EU countries. We built a conceptual framework, based on spatial fit, coordination capacity and participatory governance theories, to assess the scale at which these boards are established as well as the type of coordination and participation they support. The results indicate the relevance of the sub-River Basin District level to promote participatory decision-making. However, a clear linkage between participatory processes conducted at the sub-district level and decision-making processes at River Basin District should be established. Only if this link is well established are the outcomes achieved through the coordination and participation boards included in river basin plans. Moreover, we identified a lack of knowledge on how planning and implementation activities carried out at sub-River Basin District are aggregated and coordinated for the entire District. Research could contribute to this issue, by focusing on coordination mechanisms and problems that occur at the River Basin District level.

Highlights

  • European water resources are definitely under pressure: more than half of surface water bodies have a less than good ecological status, and approximately 25% of the groundwater is reported to have a poor chemical status [1]

  • We looked at how countries have adapted their water governance structures and what role, composition, functioning and resources ‘availability Coordination and Participation Boards (CPBs) had in the development of River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs)

  • This paper seeks to contribute to research regarding the functioning and effectiveness of new institutions, actions and activities that have come into being as a result of whole of the river basin district’ (WFD) implementation [14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

European water resources are definitely under pressure: more than half of surface water bodies have a less than good ecological status, and approximately 25% of the groundwater is reported to have a poor chemical status [1]. The WFD reflects a narrower and more technical vision of IWRM with a primary focus on water sector [3] and its overall aim is to establish a framework for the protection of water resources that applies to all available water bodies in Europe. For this purpose, two targets were set in 2000: first, preventing further deterioration of water bodies, and second, improving their state with the aim of achieving ‘good water status’ by 2015 (Article 4, WFD).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.