Abstract
Hansmann’s theory explains the success of the traditional (capitalistic) firm in terms of transaction costs, asserting that the costs of ownership incurred by capitalist are lower with respect to the costs of contracting that other groups of patrons would have to incur for the acquisition of capital, through the instruments available to the market. The relatively low number of worker-owned firms, on the other hand, is mainly explained by the heterogeneity of the interests among the workers in a firm, which would lead to difficulties in taking collective decisions, thus sharply increasing the costs of ownership of this group of patrons. Although Hansmann’s theory is a step forward with respect to the Ward-Vanek model, it does not fully explain why cooperatives take on the form of quasi non-profit firms in countries where they have greater importance, and above all, it does not fully explain their success, which indicates, at least in these cases, that there are none of the problems he emphasizes regarding collective decision-making, or that the quasi non-profit feature probably represents the tool for overcoming these difficulties.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of business and social research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.