Abstract

This study investigates how competition or cooperation are implemented strategically by the headquarters (HQ) to influence its subsidiaries’ behavior. In specific, we center our attention on the strategies MNEs consider for different internal configurations of competition or cooperation. Our main argument is that competitive or cooperative relationships are socially constructed and to discuss this we combine literature-based conceptual arguments with empirical observations on headquarters-subsidiary relationships. Our study demonstrates that cooperation or competition (whether headquarter-led or subsidiary-led) are manifestations of reward systems, mandates, and position systems. These important strategic and structural influencing factors explain how technologies are developed and how responsibilities are distributed across the organization. Hence, organizing sometimes for competition or sometimes for cooperation is challenging, yet very helpful, to headquarters addressing innovation capability development, to facilitate knowledge transfer and learning as well as to advance technological innovation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.