Abstract

ABSTRACT As a business mode, cross-border e-commerce responds to the trend of globalization. It is an effective means for numerous enterprises to open up new businesses, expand new markets, and overcome trade barriers. More and more enterprises are beginning to explore cross-border e-commerce. Notwithstanding, there is no theoretical guidance for the selection of cross-border e-commerce partners. This leads to the inefficiency of cross-border cooperation. How scientifically and rationally facilitate the inter-firm cooperation is a topic worthy intensive study. Drawing upon cognitive behavior theory, relational governance theory, and transactional cost theory, this paper examines the mechanism of corporate reputation of cross-border e-commerce on inter-firm cooperation under different levels of information sharing. Based on the analysis of the questionnaire data of cross-border e-commerce enterprises, it finds that the corporate reputation of cross-border e-commerce has a significant impact on inter-firm trust and both corporate reputation and inter-firm trust can promote inter-firm cooperation; inter-firm trust partially mediates the relationship between corporate reputation and inter-firm cooperation; with the increase of the levels of information sharing, the positive impact of inter-firm trust on inter-firm cooperation weakens. The conclusions provide theoretical basis for the selection of cross-border e-commerce partners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.