Abstract
Among the epileptic syndromes occurring during infancy, which are mostly non-idiopathic and associated with a poor prognosis, benign infantile convulsions are characterized by a favourable evolution. This work aims to analyse and compare the clinical, EEG and outcome characteristics of familial benign infantile convulsions (FBIC) and non-familial benign infantile convulsions (NFBIC). This is a retrospective study, conducted between 1988 and 2008, in 40 infants who presented benign infantile seizures during the two first years of life. All of them had no personal history, normal psychomotor development, normal neurological examinations, no abnormalities on biological and radiological investigations and a favourable outcome. In 14 cases, there was a familial history of familial benign infantile convulsions. However, among the 26 cases with non-familial benign infantile convulsions, 11 children had a familial history of other epileptic syndrome. That may suggest a genetic familial susceptibility. In the two groups, the clinical features and the electroencephalography were similar. The seizures had short duration and occurred most often in clusters. Twenty-nine children had secondarily generalized partial seizures and 11 infants had generalized seizures but a focal onset cannot be excluded. The antiepileptic drugs allowed rapid resolution of seizures. One child necessitated a prolonged antiepileptic treatment. In the other cases, seizures cured in the first year without recurrence of seizures after treatment discontinuation. The evolution was characterised in five children by a later occurrence of dystonia. This subgroup was described as infantile convulsion and choreoathetosis syndrome (ICCA). Benign infantile convulsions are probably an underestimated epileptic syndrome. The diagnosis is relatively easy in the familial forms with dominant autosomal transmission. In contrast, in sporadic forms, the diagnosis can be confirmed only by the evolution. The good prognosis must be tempered by the subsequent onset of dystonia consisted in the ICCA syndrome and justifies a prolonged follow-up.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.