Abstract

Conventional finger-vein recognition systems perform recognition based on the finger-vein lines extracted from the input images or image enhancement, and texture feature extraction from the finger-vein images. In these cases, however, the inaccurate detection of finger-vein lines lowers the recognition accuracy. In the case of texture feature extraction, the developer must experimentally decide on a form of the optimal filter for extraction considering the characteristics of the image database. To address this problem, this research proposes a finger-vein recognition method that is robust to various database types and environmental changes based on the convolutional neural network (CNN). In the experiments using the two finger-vein databases constructed in this research and the SDUMLA-HMT finger-vein database, which is an open database, the method proposed in this research showed a better performance compared to the conventional methods.

Highlights

  • Typical biometric technologies include face [1,2], fingerprint [3,4], iris [5,6], and finger-vein recognition [7,8]

  • We propose a finger-vein recognition method that is robust to various database types and environmental changes based on the convolutional neural network (CNN)

  • In the case of texture feature extraction, the developer must experimentally decide on a form of the optimal filter for extraction considering the characteristics of the image database

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Typical biometric technologies include face [1,2], fingerprint [3,4], iris [5,6], and finger-vein recognition [7,8]. In previous research [11], the performance comparisons of biometric technologies of face, fingerprint, iris, finger-vein, and voice are explained. There are generally two factors that lower the recognition performance in finger-vein recognition systems: misalignment by translation and rotation of the finger, which occurs at the time of capturing the finger-vein image, and shading on the finger-vein image. The first factor involves the misalignment between the finger-vein patterns in the enrolled image and the recognition image due to the translation and rotation of the finger on the finger-vein image capturing device during a recognition attempt

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call