Abstract

A trade mark investigator's testimony that he was aware that certain trade marks were registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office, but did not personally view the registration documents or present evidence of use of authentic marks, was insufficient to support a conviction for trade mark counterfeiting under Ohio law.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call