Abstract
IntroductionGlenoid component loosening is a common cause of late failure after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and revision can be challenging due to glenoid bone loss. Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) requiring glenoid bone graft is associated with relatively high failure rates. Revision to humeral hemiarthroplasty (HHA) is an alternative. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of revision of failed aTSA, with severe glenoid bone loss and intact rotator cuff to HHA. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 18 patients (12 males) with failed aTSA, intact rotator cuff, and severe glenoid bone loss who were revised to HHA at a mean age of 68.9 ± 9.2 years and 9.0 ± 4.1 years after index aTSA. Mean follow-up was 7.6 ± 5.7 years. Glenoid defects were uncontained in 6 (33%). Glenoid bone grafting was performed in 11 (61%). A larger humeral head was used in 15 (83%) cases. Outcomes were assessed with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), VAS pain, VAS quality of life (QoL), and shoulder range of motion. Plain radiographs were analyzed. ResultsThere were significant improvements in SST (p=0.005) and VAS pain (p<0.001). Mean active forward elevation improved from 106 ± 36° to 120° ± 21° (p=0.062). MCID for SST was met in 7 (39%) and VAS pain in 11 (61%). At final follow-up, 11 patients (61%) were satisfied with their current symptoms, two (11%) rated their satisfaction as neutral, and five (28%) were dissatisfied. There was progressive humeral medialization in 8 that was not significantly associated with the use of glenoid bone grafting (p=0.912). Greater humeral medialization was strongly correlated with less improvement in SST (ρ= 0.68) and VAS QoL (ρ=-0.64). Seven patients had ≥ 2 positive intraoperative cultures, all Cutebacterium acnes. Three patients (17%) underwent subsequent revision to treat persistent pain and dysfunction; 1 to HHA, 2 to RSA. ConclusionRevision of failed aTSA with severe glenoid bone loss and functional rotator cuff to HHA can provide improved pain and patient reported outcome with low complication and re-revision rates, and should be considered in selected cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.